A Brief Opinion: What You Eat Is Your Business?


Get into this article “what you eat is your business? This June 2020, Time Magazine and ABC News hold a three-day summit on obesity. ABC News anchor Peter Jennings, who aired a special primetime anchor last December, will host “How to Get Fat Without Really Trying.” Judging by the schedule, the summit promises to be a peep rally for media, nutritionists, and policymakers – campaigning for government anti-obesity initiatives, including banning junk food on school vending machines, federal funding for new bike trails, and staging sidewalks.

More demanding labels, marketing of food to children with disabilities, and promoting the food industry to more “responsible” behavior, in other words, bringing the government between you and your waistline.


Politicians budget on “what you eat is your business.”

Politicians have already climbed about this matter. President Bush had set aside $200 million in his budget for anti-obesity measures. State legislatures and school boards brought snacks and soda from school campuses and vending machines across the country. 

Joe Lieberman and Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown’ were invited for a “fat tax” for high-calorie national meals. Congress (India) is now considering menu-labeling legislation to send every menu item to the laboratory for nutrition testing.

The government’s responsibility against obesity

This may be the wrong way to fight against obesity. Still, instead of interfering or interfering in the layout of alternative options available to American consumers, the government should work to maintain responsibility and ownership of our own health and well-being. But we are doing just the opposite.

Hillary Clinton on “what you eat is your business.”

For decades, America’s health care system has been moving towards socialism. Your health, shape, and condition consider a matter of “public health” rather than a matter of personal responsibility. Our lawmakers are bringing a huge entitlement for which some people are paying for another person’s medicine. 

Sen. Hillary Clinton has just written a lengthy article in the New York Times magazine calling for more federal health care regulation. The Democratic nominee for president was proud of his plans to push health care into the public sector. 

Discourse private health insurers

More and more, states are discouraging private health insurers from charging higher premiums to overweight and obese clients, effectively removing any financial incentives to maintain a healthy lifestyle.

Read also: 13 health insurance tricks that can save you thousands

Our responsibility for “what you eat is your business.”

We are becoming less responsible for our own health and more responsible for everyone. Your heart attack increases the price of my premium and office visits. If the government pays for my anti-cholesterol drugs, what motivation do I have to take down the pizzeria?

Discourages combined ownership of private health care

This combined ownership of the private health care system paves the way for more federal restrictions on consumer choice and civil liberties. 

In a society, everyone is responsible for everyone’s well-being – a society that is more willing to accept government restrictions, for example – what can McDonald’s put on its menucan Safeway or Kruger put groceries on the shelves or blame food companies? They actually do for bad habits of unhealthy customers.

Read also: 5 Science Supported Healthy Food Tips

Food industry’s responsibility

This process is being initiated by a growing army of nutritionists and enemies of the food industry. “We are going beyond ‘personal responsibility,” said Margo Wootan of the Center for Public Interest Science. The largest organization of trial lawyers encourages its members to “poll candidates who are biased towards personal liability.” Jennings ended the program with a sympathetic appeal for government intervention in the fight against obesity.

Solve public health care issue 

The best way to solve the “public health” crisis is to eliminate obesity from the field of public health. It is by no means here. It’s not easy to think of something more personal and less of a public concern than what we put in our bodies. 

It only becomes public when we force the public to pay for the outcome of these choices. If policymakers want to fight obesity, they will stop medical treatment socialization and take steps to restore individual Americans to their own health and return to individual Americans.

Stopping plans for medicines and healthcare

That means rewarding healthy lifestyles and freeing up insurance companies to punish the poor. This means stopping plans for further socialization of medicines and healthcare. Congress should increase access to medical and health savings accounts, which gives customers the option to roll the money-saving for healthcare into a retirement account. 

These accounts introduce accountability to the healthcare system and encourage caution with someone’s healthcare dollars. When we spend money on health care that does not belong to our employer or government but can spend money on our own retirement, we are less likely to visit a doctor at the first sign of a cold.

Final verdict

While no one else has paid for the results of these choices, we should make better choices about diet, exercise, and personal health.

Read more: The quality of American food may reduce the health-related costs